AttachKit vs. Stirling PDF — self-hosted open-source vs. zero-install in any browser
Stirling PDF: A self-hosted, open-source PDF toolbox — ~50 tools you run yourself via Docker.
Stirling PDF is the privacy-conscious developer's pick, and for good reason: it's genuinely open-source (you can read and audit every line) and fully self-hostable, so when you run it yourself your files stay entirely on your own infrastructure, across ~50 tools. That openness and control is real, and we won't undersell it — if you want to own the whole stack, Stirling is excellent. AttachKit makes a different trade: there's nothing to self-host, no Docker, no server to maintain — it runs in any browser instantly, with the file processed on-device and never uploaded, plus AI auto-fill and offline-verifiable signatures. The honest catch on our side: AttachKit is not open-source.
Why pick AttachKit for these cases
- Nothing to self-host, no Docker, no server to maintain — runs in any browser instantly.
- Stirling is fully open-source and self-hostable (a genuine advantage if you want to own the stack); AttachKit's privacy is architectural — the file never leaves your browser.
- AI auto-fill from a saved profile, which Stirling doesn't offer.
- An offline-verifiable signature anyone can check without running anything.
Side-by-side
A marks the side with the genuine advantage on that row — honestly, including the few where Stirling PDF wins.
Switching questions, answered
- Isn't self-hosting Stirling PDF more private than AttachKit?
- When you self-host Stirling correctly, your files stay entirely on your own infrastructure — that's genuinely strong, and being open-source means you can audit exactly what it does. The trade-off is that it's only as private and secure as your deployment (you host, secure, and update it). AttachKit gives you no-upload privacy with nothing to run or maintain: the file is processed in your browser, which you can verify in the Network tab. Different paths to the same goal — total control vs. zero setup.
- Is AttachKit open-source like Stirling PDF?
- No — AttachKit is not open-source, and that's a real point in Stirling's favour if openness and auditability are priorities for you. What AttachKit offers instead is verifiable behaviour in the browser: because the file is processed client-side, you can open your Network tab and confirm nothing is uploaded, without needing the source code or your own server.
- When should I use Stirling PDF instead of AttachKit?
- When you want open-source software you can audit and run entirely on your own infrastructure, the widest possible set of PDF operations (~50 tools), or full control over hosting — Stirling is excellent for that, and the right pick for many developers and self-hosters. AttachKit is for when you'd rather not run anything: zero-install in any browser, no-upload by architecture, plus AI auto-fill and offline-verifiable signatures.
Try AttachKit now
Drop a PDF — no signup. Unlimited fill & redact in your browser, plus 15 free signed PDFs every month.
Switching for good? Save your details once — every future form auto-fills.